In legal cases involving head injuries, the concept of comparative negligence often plays a pivotal role in determining the outcome of a claim. In Idaho, like many states, comparative negligence laws can significantly affect the compensation a plaintiff receives in a personal injury lawsuit. This blog post will explain Idaho’s comparative negligence laws and illustrate their impact on head injury claims through examples and hypothetical scenarios.
What is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to apportion fault in cases where multiple parties are responsible for an injury. Under this rule, a plaintiff’s compensation is reduced by a percentage equal to their share of fault in the incident that caused the injury.
Idaho’s Approach to Comparative Negligence
Idaho follows a “modified comparative negligence” system. In this system, a plaintiff can recover damages only if they are less than 50% responsible for their injury. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any damages.
Impact on Head Injury Claims
Scenario 1: Car Accident
- Situation: Sarah sustains a head injury in a car accident where the other driver ran a red light, but she was texting while driving.
- Application of Comparative Negligence: If Sarah is found to be 40% responsible for the accident because she was distracted, and the other driver 60%, her compensation will be reduced by her share of the fault (40%).
Scenario 2: Sports-Related Injury
- Situation: Alex, a high school football player, suffers a concussion during a game. He had previously complained about the poor fit of his helmet, which was not addressed by the coach.
- Application of Comparative Negligence: If the court finds the school 70% responsible for not providing proper equipment and Alex 30% responsible for not insisting on a better helmet, Alex’s compensation would be reduced by 30%.
Legal Strategies and Considerations
- Evidence Gathering: To effectively argue comparative negligence, it’s essential to gather comprehensive evidence about the incident, including witness statements and expert testimony.
- Understanding the Impact: Plaintiffs must understand how their own actions or negligence contributed to their injury and how this will affect their potential compensation.
- Legal Advice: It’s advisable for plaintiffs in head injury cases to seek legal counsel to navigate the complexities of comparative negligence in Idaho.
Conclusion
In head injury cases in Idaho, understanding and navigating the principles of comparative negligence is crucial. These laws ensure that damages are fairly distributed based on each party’s level of fault. However, they also highlight the importance of taking personal responsibility to minimize one’s own risk of injury. As each case presents unique challenges, consulting with a legal professional can provide clarity and help in achieving a fair outcome.
Contact Us.
If you have a head or brain injury through the fault of some other person or entity, call us at 208-733-4787 for a free consultation and you’ll be one step closer to receiving the compensation you deserve.
We have 3 convenient locations in Twin Falls, Burley & Ketchum. We also serve the communities of Rupert, Hailey, Jerome, Gooding and all surrounding areas in Southern Idaho.
Zoom video visits available.